Why are the matches in the 2022 World Cup so long?


we are still in the early stages 2022 world cup But already a theme has emerged that has characterized many of the Games in Qatar so far.

All four matches in the tournament on Sunday and Monday saw long injury time periods at the ends of both halves, to the point where each of those games lasted a total of more than 100 minutes, well over the regulation 90. more than .

The fans watched with attention the unusual amount of injury time being allotted by the officials, especially during englandFirst match of Group B against Iran In which both the halves took a total of 27 minutes of additional time.

, Stream on ESPN+: LaLiga, Bundesliga, more (US)

Queue 0-2 Ecuador (100 min, 18 sec)

The clues were clear that something interesting was brewing in the first match of the 2022 World Cup as hosts Qatar took on Ecuador at the Al Bayt Stadium. The opening game saw around five extra minutes added at the end of both halves – mainly due to an initial VAR investigation, which disallowed a goal in the first half and some minor fouls in the second.

England 6-2 Iran (117:16)

Things escalated in the second game of the tournament after Iran’s goalkeeper suffered a serious injury Alireza Baronvand The player had to undergo an extended concussion test on the pitch before being substituted, which led to 14:08 of stoppage time being added to the first half.

Just to top it off, another (though thankfully less severe) head injury was suffered harry maguire 13:08 of stoppage time was added at the end of the second half after the associated interval with a huge group of substitutions.

long delays allowed Mehdi Teremi Iran went on to score a bunch of late consolation goals, the second of which (timed at 102:30) was the latest non-extra time goal scored at the World Cup since 1996. The overtime ending (as far as reliable records are kept) of the longest World Cup game since 1966 that did not go to extra time.

After a fairly monotonous first half, the second half of the Netherlands’ opener against Senegal stretched to 10:03 of regulation time, long enough for the Dutch to clinch the win with a couple of late goals.

whereas kodi gakpoAustralia’s 84th-minute opener came during regulation time, Davy Klaasen’s ridiculously late second (98:17) is now second only to Teremi’s penalty against England in the latest non-extra time World Cup goal stakes.

While only four minutes were added to stoppage time in the first half, nine additional minutes were signaled by the officials at the end of the second half. Nevertheless, the actual amount played was 10:34, giving the 2022 World Cup the duration of the third longest half of football ever played.

Gareth Bale He was already clearly flagged when he broke home Wales’ equalizer from the penalty spot in the 82nd minute, but had to play for almost 20 minutes from that point until the whistle finally blew.

unexpectedly, LAFC The star admitted after the final whistle that he and his compatriots were feeling “a bit tired” at the end of a long encounter.

Bell told ITV after the match, “I can’t believe nine minutes were added to it, I don’t know where it came from.” “But we have to dig deep for our country, we always do and we keep going.”

So the first four games in Qatar saw about 65 minutes of extra time shared between them due to various stoppages.

Of course, the longest delay seen during England’s victory over Iran was mainly the result of concussions and suspected concussions by Beiranvand and Maguire. However, overall the longer period of extra time by officials at the 2022 World Cup is part of a concerted effort by FIFA to reduce time-wasting during the Games.

The intention is to monitor the stoppage time of a given match more accurately, with the same “wasted” time being added back onto the clock at the end of each half.

talking to espn The Gab and Jules ShowPierluigi Collina, former World Cup referee and current chairman of the FIFA Referees Committee, explained both the rationale and the in-game mechanics of the new anti-time-wasting rules – rules that were first drawn up for the 2018 finals. Russia,

Colina said, “When we talk about the time wasted in a match, we must differentiate between the time wasted because of the game and the time wasted intentionally by the players. The biggest part is the time wasted because of the match. Time is done.”

“What we’ve already done in Russia, you may remember, is to more accurately calculate compensation time at the end of each half. We said to everyone, don’t be surprised because you see the fourth official pushing the electronic board Picking up the scale, you’ll see the numbers on it: six, seven, eight minutes.”

The 62-year-old Italian explained that on average several minutes are “lost” in the work of players going through routine actions such as taking throw-ins and goal kicks. Therefore, to help compensate for lost time, an expected “active time” would be added at the end of each half.

“Think of a match where three goals are scored in one half,” said Colina. “The celebration usually takes a minute and a half. So with three goals scored, basically you lose five, six minutes.

“So what we really want to do is get an accurate count of the time to be added at the end of each half.”

He also confirmed that any time lost during VAR checks will be counted by the fourth official on duty and informed to the referee during the match.

“The time lost for VAR is calculated by the video assistant referee in a very quick, accurate way. It will be the fourth official who usually proposes the amount of time to be added and the referee decides.”

So while those extra-long matches in the early days of the group stage may have taken the viewing world by surprise, they are something we will all have to get used to.

Source link