Why the referee dismissed the VAR penalty for Ghana vs Darwin Nunez


We’re analyzing every VAR decision made in all 64 games Feather 2022 world cup, Uruguay2-0 win Ghana VAR was full of drama — more so than penalties to both teams.

After each game, we take a look at key incidents to examine and explain the process in terms of both VAR protocol and the Laws of the Game.

– Full review of World Cup VAR: analyzed every decision

VAR reversal overruled: Núñez fined for foul by Amartya

What happened: In the 58th minute, Darwin Nunez broke into the box and challenged by Ghana Protector Daniel Amarte, Referee Siebert dismissed the penalty claims, but VAR advised he should go to the monitors to review the incident.

VAR Decision: No penalty.

VAR Review: For only the second time in the tournament, a referee stuck to his original decision after being sent off on the pitchside monitors – but it is the first time the specific reason for the review has been overruled. In Denmark v Tunisia, the referee noticed a foul in the buildup when reviewing a possible handball penalty.

Siebert looked at the incident from several angles, and ultimately concluded that he had made no clear and obvious error in allowing the game to continue.

There is no doubt that Amartya gets his toe to the ball, the question is whether he fouled Nunez in the process of reaching for it. Some angles suggested that they Uruguay Striker first and then the ball, others were less decisive.

Some would argue that it should have been a spot kick, but it is a borderline decision and you can’t argue with the referee standing over his decision after being shown all angles.

The ball hit Nunez on the arm before he was brought down, but it was not assessed. play restarted with a dropped ball instead of a free kick (it was not out of play when the referee saw play) Ghana For handball in his own penalty area.

Uruguay had another claim for a penalty in injury time when Edinson Cavani legs tangled with alidu sedu, This is similar to Canada’s penalty claim versus Belgium, when Richie Larrea tangled with Axel Witsel. Those are the kind of challenges that are usually left to the on-field decision – whether the referee has awarded a penalty or not.

VAR reversed: Qudus fined for a foul by Rochette

What happened: in the 15th minute, jordan ayu had a shot on target, which Andre Ayew Got out of the way. it is poled out by the goalkeeper Sergio Rochetbut only as far as Mohammed Quddus, when Ghana The striker went to the ball, Rochette came running out and collided with him. But any claim for a penalty was quashed when the offside flag went up against Andre Ayew before the decision could be reviewed.

VAR Decision: Penalty, Andre Ayew’s effort saved by Rochette.

VAR Review: A simple decision, even if it comes in two parts. The first question is offside against Andre Ayew. Even if he didn’t touch the ball, his movement to let the shot go into goal would have been an offence. However, FIFA’s offside technology showed that he was being played offside by the defender’s trailing boot. mathias oliverSo the assistant’s flag was wrong.

With the offside invalid, it opens up review for a possible penalty for Rochette’s challenge on Qudus. The striker almost certainly reaches the ball first before the goalkeeper hits it, so it’s no surprise that VAR, Bastian Dankert’s GermanyThe referee and compatriot Daniel Siebert were advised to review the challenge on the monitors.

The reverse angle provided the evidence needed to convict Siebert, which was undoubtedly the right decision. That the ball could have been out of play is of no relevance to the penalty decision.

Source link